missing_csrf_protectionMissing Csrf Protection — a PullGuard finding type. Findings of this type appear in the PR comment, Step Summary, SARIF (GitHub Security tab / IDE viewers), and the HTML report, each with severity, location, and the remediation guidance below.
// Express (csurf, legacy)
const csrf = require("csurf");
app.use(csrf({ cookie: true }));
// Express (csrf-csrf, modern)
const { doubleCsrf } = require("csrf-csrf");
const { doubleCsrfProtection } = doubleCsrf({ getSecret: () => secret });
app.use(doubleCsrfProtection);
// Spring Security
http.csrf().csrfTokenRepository(CookieCsrfTokenRepository.withHttpOnlyFalse());
// Django — remove @csrf_exempt
def my_view(request): ... # no decorator = protected
// Flask — re-enable WTF
app.config["WTF_CSRF_ENABLED"] = True
// Rails — restore protect_from_forgery
class ApplicationController < ActionController::Base
protect_from_forgery with: :exception
end // .driftrc.yml
analyzers:
builtin/csrf:
enabled: false # JWT-only API; CODEOWNERS reviewed 2026-Q2 Suppress a confirmed non-issue with a committed .pullguardignore
entry (pullguard ignore locally, or comment
/pullguard ignore <fingerprint> <reason> on the PR — the
fingerprint is printed in the PR comment’s Triage section). Entries support
expiresAt for time-boxed snoozes.
Security findings at major or critical severity — and any critical finding —
always surface: .pullguardignore cannot hide them. The reviewed
paths that keep them visible are acknowledged (reviewed, stays in reports)
and, for a confirmed false positive, a reasoned false_positive entry —
visible and audited, excluded only from the merge block.