PullGuard vs Snyk — a Snyk alternative that runs in your CI

Capability	PullGuard	Snyk
OWASP Top 10 detection	15 checks	Yes
Inter-procedural / cross-file taint	Cross-file	Yes
Code quality analysis	13 analyzers	No
Dependency CVE scanning	5 ecosystems	Core
Cost-of-change ($/finding)	Yes	No
SOC 2 security evidence	8 controls	No
Multi-framework compliance (HIPAA/PCI/NIST/ISO 27001)	All 4	No
AI-era risk + AI×security composite	Yes	No
PR-delta / baselines (Clean as You Code)	Yes	Yes
Air-gapped reports & dashboard	Self-contained HTML	Cloud only
Self-hosted / air-gapped scan	Docker (offline key)	Cloud only

Capabilities reflect each tool's publicly documented tiers; "$" denotes a paid tier. PullGuard's OWASP parity is backed by a runnable fixture corpus (18/18 vs Semgrep Pro). Last reviewed 2026-06-24.

What PullGuard adds over Snyk

✓Code-quality and architecture analysis
✓Deep in-repo SAST with cross-file taint that runs in your CI (not the cloud)
✓Five compliance frameworks (SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI DSS, NIST 800-53, ISO 27001)
✓AI-era risk detection + an AI×security composite
✓Cost-of-change estimates ($/finding)
✓Self-hosted and air-gapped operation — source code never leaves your runner

Where Snyk is a strong fit

Snyk is a strong fit when your focus is best-in-class software composition analysis (SCA), container, and IaC scanning with a large vulnerability database and automated fix PRs, and a cloud platform is acceptable.

PullGuard's goal isn't to win every row — it's to give most teams one GitHub-native tool that covers security, quality, dependencies, and compliance on every PR, with your code never leaving your runner.

Try PullGuard on your next pull request

Free tier, no account required. Migrating from Snyk? We help with migration.

Read the install guide